PRAWDA LITERATURY FAKTU A PRAWDA LITERACKIEGO ŚWIADECTWA (CHAIM GRADE – JÓZEF MACKIEWICZ – CZESŁAW MIŁOSZ)

Autor

  • Walentyna Krupowies

Słowa kluczowe:

truth, literature of fact, literary witness, main character-eyewitness

Abstrakt

I my work I refer to separated in literary discourse from the wide range of non-fiction literature literary witness. Both types of literature from the assumption refer to authentic events and include truthful style of perception. In my article I try to investigate weather there are any differences between the truth of literature of fact and the truth literary witness on selected texts of three authors: Chaim Grade, Józef Mackiewicz i Czesław Miłosz.
I must be pointed that literary witness in the first place struggling with specifying of the inner truth of the main character, who experienced a borderline situation. Literature of fact is a transcription of a story of an eyewitness, who forwards the truth of the events.

Pobrania

Brak dostęþnych danych do wyświetlenia.

Pobrania

Opublikowane

2019-09-16

Jak cytować

Krupowies, W. (2019). PRAWDA LITERATURY FAKTU A PRAWDA LITERACKIEGO ŚWIADECTWA (CHAIM GRADE – JÓZEF MACKIEWICZ – CZESŁAW MIŁOSZ). Conversatoria Litteraria, 10(-), 345–359. Pobrano z https://czasopisma.uph.edu.pl/conversatorialitteraria/article/view/1031